----------------------- Page 1-----------------------

Question：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Society benefits more from works  

of great artist than from political leaders.  

sample answer：  

I agree with the notion that society benefits more from the work of great artists than from political  

leaders. Art can be so pure and immediate, whereas political leaders can take months or even years to  

make decisions. Artists can capture small and beautiful moments of humanity, with no real agenda,  

whereas politicians naturally have an agenda and can have their true feelings stifled by trying to please  

their voters. Political leaders can also cause a great deal of harm to society at times, whereas artists  

rarely do.  

It is very easy for society to benefit from art. There are thousands and thousands of paintings, films,  

books, and other artistic creations freely available to people at any given time. These artworks can  

inspire, delight, shock, and inform people about the world with a certain immediacy and intimacy.  

They can aid people in discerning what qualities in life they value the most. It may sound simplistic,  

but many people really do grow and better themselves through exposure to art. Politicians, on the other  

hand, can be extremely slow to act. Certain laws can be beneficial to society, of course. But it can take  

months or years to enact laws, with a large amount of voting and bickering along the way. A person  

could experience countless pieces of art before a political leader did something that directly affected  

them.  

Art also does not require a political agenda. Some of the most stirring artworks are ones that simply  

study characters or show snippets of human life, allowing us to feel whatever we may. On the other  

side of things, politicians by nature are going to have an agenda they are trying to push. Furthermore,  

the things they tell the public can be untrue or simply insincere attempts to win votes. It can be  

disheartening to hear a political leader give a speech on something you are passionate about, such as  

the environment or healthcare, and realize the politician only seems to suddenly care about this topic  

because there is an election coming up. Politicians seem to repeatedly toy with our emotions in this  

way. At least with the work of artists, we know they are saying what they mean. Our positive reactions  

are based on something solid and genuine.  

Finally, when political leaders do turn their words into actions, there can sometimes be dire  

consequences. Politicians can declare war, cut funding that helps the poor, and many other awful  

things. They can hurt society in real, substantial ways. Art, for all the influence it can have on people,  

very rarely does actual harm.  

  That’s why I believe society benefits more from the work of great artists than from political leaders.  

Art is consistently available and can help people formulate their ideas about the world, unlike the  

somewhat stifled political system. Politicians can be conniving and always have an agenda to push,  

where art is more pure. And the actions of politicians can have horrible real life consequences, where  

art rarely hurts people in such a way.